Saturday, 8 February 2020

to kill a killer : by Lubna Abdel Aziz

To kill a killer

Once banished from Paradise, man began to dread his many killers. As if set on his destruction, Nature unleashed her wrath upon him in a variety of catastrophic outbursts -- fires, floods, famines, earthquakes, and epidemics. He was quick to assist her by inventing wars, genocides and weapons of destruction to bring down his fellow man. Throughout history his biggest killer has been disease in all its shapes, colours and forms. Besides massive killer epidemics like the Black Plague of yesteryear, and AIDS of today, the persistent, silent, solid killer has been cancer, the big C!
Hippocrates (c. 460-370 BC) He saw a crab

Cancer is a disease in which cells multiply without control destroying healthy tissue. It occurs in animals, plants, and humans of all ages. Contrary to popular belief, cancer is not the by-product of our modern age, the child of fast foods and cigarettes. Since the earliest times, cancer has been described in the history of medicine. Dinosaur fossils have revealed cancer cells as far back as 70-80 million years. In 1932, famed anthropologist Louis Leaky found the oldest reported malignant tumour in the remains of an Australopithecus hominid that lived 3.9--4.2 million years ago. Cancer cells were discovered in 5,000 year-old Egyptian mummies. An ancient Egyptian papyrus describing tumours of the breast (3000-1500 BC) is the oldest record of the disease. Even the rarest of cancers today, existed in ancient civilisations. Tumours were removed surgically in Babylon by 1750 BC, and ancient Egyptians diagnosed and distinguished between benign and malignant tumours. Some were removed by cauterisation (1600 BC), others were treated by various modes of medicine and magic.
With the decline of the ancient Egyptian civilisation, no medical records exist until the rise of the Greeks. Hippocrates (c. 460--370 BC) dominated medical thinking for several centuries. Known as the "Father of Medicine", and author of the "Hippocratic Oath", still recited by physicians today, he lifted medicine out of the realm of magic, superstition and religion, where it had languished for years, and defined disease as a natural process. Hippocrates is responsible for the word 'cancer'. On observing the swollen blood vessels of the central tumour, and the finger-like extensions around it, he was reminded of a crab. He called it "karkinos" (Greek for crab), translated into English as "carcinos" or "carcinoma". It was another Greek who practised in Rome, Claudius Galen (129--216 AD) who is considered medicine's first oncologist. Although Galen surgically removed some tumours, he considered cancer to be incurable in the majority of cases. After the fall of Rome, Constantinople became the seat of knowledge. The ancient teachings of Galen spread to the known civilised world -- Cairo, Alexandria, Athens, Antioch, during which time, Europeans still continued to use magic spells and myths to cure disease.
Efforts to cure cancer were dormant, or at best, slow to progress. By the 17th century, Europe had come out of the darkness, and the knowledge of the human body and disease found their place in the foreground of scientific endeavour.
By the 18th century Dutch surgeon Adrian Helvetius (1715--1771) performed both "lumpectomy" and "mastectomy" surgery for breast cancer. Famous Scottish surgeon John Hunter (1728--1793) conceded "as long as the tumour had not invaded nearby tissue and was moveable, there is no impropriety in removing it." The discovery of X-Ray technology by Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen made it possible to kill cancer cells with radiation. Then came mustard gas, a chemical warfare agent used in WWI. During WWII it became apparent that exposure to this agent resulted in damage to white blood cells rendering them abnormally low. It was easy to conclude that if mustard gas damaged the rapidly growing white blood cells, surely it could have a similar effect on cancer cells. Several patients with advanced lymphomas -- a form of cancer of the white blood cells -- were given the drug through their veins rather than breathing the irritating gas. The experiment proved effective, launching the widespread discipline of chemotherapy for treatment of cancer.
No matter how fast or how far advances were made, it was never fast or far enough. The big C would lash at will indiscriminately, killing seven million people worldwide in 2001 according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Of course we helped accelerate its triumph by smoking, alcohol, pollution, and a diet deficient in fruits and vegetables, lifestyles that are known to be predisposing factors in the genesis of cancer.
According to WHO, 21 per cent of deaths by cancer in 2001 were related to smoking, five per centto alcohol, five per cent to a diet deficient in fruits and vegetables, two per cent to obesity and inactivity, one per cent to urban pollution, and 0.5 per cent to the household use of solid fuels.
Numerous organisations housing uniformed combatants around the world are now dedicated to the fight against those killer cells. Armies of scientists and physicians confine themselves between the walls of hospitals, medical schools, research institutes, government agencies and voluntary groups, seeking strategies to beat the enemy. Their labour has been fruitful. The last decade has brought a bushel of good news in man's struggle against cancer, giving new hope to the fate of mankind.
Two incredible battle victories against the killer crab occurred in 2006. A breakthrough anti-cancer vaccine has been available since April, effective for more than four years in fighting five strains of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) known to be responsible for cancer of the uterine cervix.
The latest breakthrough was announced last week by Dr. Steven Rosenberg of the National Cancer Institute (USA). Researchers have taken specialised cells called T cells that are normally responsible for immunity, and genetically engineered them to recognise and attack life-threatening malignant skin cancer cells. A very fortunate patient, Mark Origer, 53, with only four months to live, can now enjoy a long and cancer-free life. Though the treatment was only successful in two of 17 patients, it brings more hope to millions of cancer victims waiting for the final defeat of the big C.
There is more work ahead, but perhaps the end is near, leaving us to concentrate on other man-killers, even deadlier than cancer.

Friday, 22 November 2019


 preview on ( Flowers for Algernon )
     After Charlie Gordon has his surgery and begins to progress from mental disability to brilliance, he has an argument with one of his coworkers, Fanny Birden. Fanny tells Charlie that it was a sin for Adam and Eve to eat from the Tree of Knowledge, because in doing so, they traded eternal happiness for knowledge. The apparent tradeoff between happiness and intelligence is one of the most important themes in Flowers for Algernon. As he becomes more and more intelligent, Charlie discovers problems he didn’t even know he had, while also finding some new outlets for pleasure.
At first, it seems that there really is a strict tradeoff between happiness and intelligence. As a mentally disabled employee of Mr. Donner’s bakery, Charlie Gordon is extremely happy, and confident that he has many good friends. From the reader’s perspective, however, it’s apparent that Charlie’s coworkers treat him horribly: they make fun of his stupidity, trip him, and force him to dance for their own cruel amusement. Blissfully unaware of the truth, Charlie (at least in the beginning) is by far the happiest character in the book, but paradoxically, no reader would trade places with him. Ignorance is bliss. And yet Charlie’s bliss seems less “real” and less desirable than that of an intelligent person, since it’s based on the delusion that Charlie’s coworkers respect him. Keyes reinforces his point after Charlie becomes intelligent, and realizes, with a shock, that his coworkers, far from liking him, have always looked down on him. Charlie’s newfound intelligence brings truth, but it doesn’t bring him any joy—on the contrary, it reminds him how small and lonely his life really, whether he’s a genius or not.
Keyes complicates the idea that ignorance is bliss in two important ways. First, he shows that intelligence can also be bliss, if only from time to time. When Charlie becomes a genius, he throws himself into his research—there’s enormous pleasure to be had in discovering things for himself. At the same time, Charlie’s research doesn’t bring him total happiness; as he admits, his desire to learn is like a torturous, unquenchable thirst. Despite the fact that Charlie’s intellectual endeavors never bring him total happiness, he continues with them. This leads Keyes to his second important point: even if intelligence isn’t always blissful, it’s the “smart man’s burden” to continue with one’s studies, for the benefit of other people. Charlie senses that his research will never make him happy, but he also knows that he can help millions by pursuing his research—and this is a far stronger mandate than mere personal bliss can ever be.
In the end, Keyes doesn’t really refute the idea that ignorance is bliss: indeed, he shows that Charlie is at his happiest when he’s mentally disabled, and at his most miserable when he’s a genius. However, he questions whether bliss should be the only goal of the human race. As Charlie gets more and more intelligent, he becomes less happy—but this certainly doesn’t mean that his life is a failure. Charlie makes the choice to use his intelligence to help other people. This choice is grounded in his sense of responsibility to his fellow humans. Moreover, Charlie’s sense of responsibility would be utterly foreign to his blissfully ignorant self. This reminds us why Charlie is the hero of the novel, and also reiterates that there are good reasons to “leave the Garden of Eden.”
copied 

Thursday, 14 November 2019

Gulliver's Travels -commentary

Jonathan Swift: Gulliver's Travels
Swift's greatest satire, Gulliver's Travels, is considered one of the most important works in the history of world literature. Published as Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World, in Four Parts; by Lemuel Gulliver in 1726,Gulliver's Travels depictsيصور one man's journeys to several strange and unusual lands. The general theme of Gulliver's Travels is a satirical examination of human nature, man's potentialالامكانيات  for depravityالفساد, and the dangers of the misuse of reason. Throughout the volume Swift attacked the basenessلؤم  of humankind even as he suggested the greatest virtues  فضائل     of the human race; he also attacked the folly of human learning and political systems even as he impliedيتضمن فى معناه  the proper functions of art, science, and government. Gulliver's Travels, some scholars believe, had its origins during Swift's years as a Tory polemicistمحارب  , when he was part of a group of prominent بارزةTory writers known as the Scriblerus Club. The group, which also included Alexander Pope, John Gay, and John Arbuthnot, among others, collaborated on several satires, including The Scriblerus Papers. They also planned a satire called The Memoirs of a Martinus Scriblerus, which was to include several imaginary voyages. An immediate success, Gulliver's Travels was inspired by this work. Swift finished Gulliver's Travels was published anonymouslyمجهولة الهوية , but Swift's authorship was widely suspected. Alternately considered an attack on humanity or a clear-eyed assessment of human strengths and weaknesses, the novel is a complex study of human nature and of the moral, philosophical, and scientific thought of Swift's time which has resisted any single definition of meaning for nearly three centuries.
Plot and Major Characters
Written in the form of a travel journal, Gulliver's Travels is the fictional account of four extraordinary voyages made by Lemuel Gulliver, a physician who signs on to serve as a ship's surgeon when he is unable to provide his family with a sufficient income in London. After being shipwrecked Gulliver first arrives at Lilliput, an island whose inhabitants are just six inches tall and where the pettinessتفاهة of the political system is mirrored in the diminutiveضآلة  size of its citizens.
Gulliver is referred to as the "Man-Mountain" by the Lilliputians and is eventually pressed into service by the King in a nonsensicalلامعنى لها  war with the neighboring island of Blefuscu. Gulliver finally escapes Lilliput and returns briefly to England before a second voyage takes him to Brobdingnag. There he finds himself dwarfed by inhabitants who are sixty feet tall. Gulliver's comparatively tiny size now makes him wholly dependent on the protection and solicitudeمواساة  of others, and he is imperiled   معرض للخطرby dangerous encounters with huge rats and a curious toddler. Gulliver, however, incursيتحمل the disdainازدراء  of the kindly and virtuous Brobdingnagian rulers when his gunpowder display, intended to impress his hosts as an exemplary product of European civilization, proves disastrous. An address Gulliver delivers to the Brobdingnagians describing English political practices of the day is also met with much scorn. Housed in a miniature box, Gulliver abruptly departs Brobdingnag when a giant eagle flies off with him and drops him in the ocean. He soon embarks on his third voyage to the flying island of Laputa, a mysterious land inhabited by scientists, magicians, and sorcerersالسحرة who engage in abstract theorizing and conduct ill-advised experiments based on flawed calculationsحسابات خاطئة. Here Gulliver also visits Glubbdubdrib where it is possible to summon the dead and to converse with such figures as Aristotle and Julius Caesar. He also travels to Luggnagg, where he encounters the Struldbrugs, a group of people who are given immortality, yet are condemnedمدانين  to live out their eternal existence trapped in feeble and decrepitهشة  bodies. Once again Gulliver returns to England before a final journey, to the land of the Houyhnhnms, who are a superior race of intelligent horses. But the region is also home to the Yahoos, a vile and depraved raceجنس منحرف of ape-like creatures. Gulliver is eventually exiled from Houyhnhnm society when the horses gently insist that Gulliver must return to live among his own kind. After this fourth and final voyage, he returns to England, where he has great difficulty adjusting to everyday life. All people everywhere remind him of the Yahoos.
Major Themes
Each of the four voyages in Gulliver's Travels serves as a vehicle for Swift to expose and excoriate some aspect of human folly. The first voyage has been interpreted as an allegorical satireنقد مجازى  of the political events of the early eighteenth century, a commentary on the moral state of England, a general satire on the pettiness of human desires for wealth and power, and a depiction of the effects of unwarranted prideالكبرالذى لاداعى له  and self-promotionحب الذات . The war with the tiny neighboring island of Blefuscu represents England's rivalry with France. In Brobdingnag, Gulliver's diminutive status serves as a reminder of how perspective and viewpoint alter one's condition and claims to power in society. The imperfect, yet highly moral Brobdingnagians represent, according to many critics, Swift's conception of ethical rulers. The voyage to Laputa, the flying island, is a scathing attack upon science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and reveals Swift's thorough acquaintance with the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, the leading publication of the scientific community of his day. The third voyage unequivocally manifests Swift's contempt and disdain for abstract theory and ideology that is not of practical service to humans. But it is the voyage to the land of the Houyhnhnms that reveals Swift's ultimate satiric object—man's inability to come to terms with his true nature

Saturday, 12 October 2019

Read the following passage and then answer the questions:


Read the following passage and then answer the questions:
       Egypt is a country with an area of about one million square kilometers. Most of the land is desert. The amount of rain each year is very small. Only 3% of Egypt - the land watered by the River Nile - can be used for farming. Over 90% of the Egyptians live and work in this small part of the country.
In the past Egypt grew its own food. But now, it has to import more than half the wheat it needs to feed its people. In 1989, the population of Egypt was already around 55 million. With 2 new babies born every minute rid people living linger lives, the population is growing fast - one and a half million new people every year as half of all Egyptians are under 20 years of age, the population will continue to grow.
    Recently an Egyptian newspaper, wrote a report on what life would be like in the year 3015 if the population continues to grow as fast as it is doing now In Cairo people would have to live in tents and travelling from one side of the city to another would take hours . With classes of 100 pupils, schools would have to be open all day to teach everybody .
     To prevent such problems, the government wants people to have smaller families on television it show the ideal family -father, mother and two children. The average family now has a bigger number of children. Families will have to get smaller if the report in that newspaper is not to come true
A. Answer the following questions;
1-Why do most Egyptians live and work in a very small area?
……………………………………………………………………………………………......................................................
2-What are the two elements that make population grow at a high rate?
……………………………………………………………………………………………...............................................................................…
3-Mention two problems that result from over - population?
……………………………………………………………………………………………...................................................................................................…
B. Choose the correct answer from a, b, c, or d ;
4 -In the past Egypt produced ....... the wheat it needed.
a) Some of          b) all          c) none of            d) a great deal of
5- If families are. ….… classrooms will be over - crowded with pupils
a) big                     b) small               c) old                    d) new

Monday, 30 September 2019

Ted Hughes 's The Iron Woman


Edward James Hughes,  (17 August 1930 – 28 October 1998) was an English poet and children's writer. Critics frequently rank him as one of the best poets of his generation, and one of the twentieth century's greatest writers. He served as Poet Laureate from 1984 until his death. In 2008 The Times ranked Hughes fourth on their list of "The 50 greatest British writers since 1945".
The Iron Woman is the 1993 sequel to the popular Ted Hughes novel The Iron Man. "The Iron Woman has come to take revenge on mankind for its thoughtless polluting of the seas, lakes and rivers" says the introduction to the novel. It references sexism, in that the iron woman exacts her revenge on a seemingly ignorant/uncaring male community (in the waste disposal plant) for polluting the area in which she lives; however, the book is more of an attack on society for the oblivious ways in which for many decades, a vast amount of habitats have been destroyed or on the brink of annihilation. Ted Hughes' novel is an attempt at getting people to be made aware of and respond to this.
The main character, 'Lucy,' finds the Iron Woman in a state of despair and covered in chemicals. After being cleaned (by Lucy), the Iron Woman takes her to see the environment in which she lives. Lucy sympathises with the Iron Woman, watching the animals' painful deaths as more toxic material is poured into the marsh from the local waste-disposal factory. She is angry and wants to save them, but ironically, her dad is one of the factory workers. Lucy contacts Hogarth, the friend of the Iron Man, asking for his help. The Iron Woman is so enraged that she turns all the men in the factory into the swamp creatures, so that they can feel what the animals of the marsh were enduring. They all burp black bubbles of cloud, which the next day, forms the Cloud Spider. "I am the Spider-god of wealth. Wealth. Wealth. The Spider-god of more and more and more and more money. I catch it in my web." The Cloud Spider is taken away by the Space-Bat-Angel-Dragon from the first novel, The Iron Man.
When the Iron Woman turns the men back to their human forms, all their hair is white, as though it has been bleached or they have aged.
The novel is full of symbolism. The snowdrops (representing white, cleanliness, purity) and foxgloves (signifying death, poison and destruction) which the Iron Woman drops during her introduction, are just a small example of the many ways in which Ted Hughes strives to make his point, making the Iron Woman cry "clean me." The Iron Woman is the embodiment of another figure in contrast to the Iron Man, such as the new character of 'Lucy' to contrast with the original character of 'Hogarth'.
الى اللغة العربيه : ترجم المظلل باللون الاصفر 




Monday, 23 September 2019

The Necklace


THE DIAMOND NECKLACE
     
The girl was one of those pretty and charming young creatures who sometimes are born, as if by a slip of fateالقدر , into a family of clerks. She had no dowry مهر, no expectations, no way of being known, understood, loved, married by any rich and distinguished man; so she let herself be married to a little clerk of the Ministry of Public Instruction وزارة التعليم. She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was unhappy as if she had really fallen from a higher station; since with women there is neither caste طبقة اجتماعية  nor rank ولارتبة اولقب , for beauty, grace and charm take the place of family and birth. Natural ingenuityابداع  , instinctغريزة / فطرة   for what is elegant, a supple مرن mind are their sole hierarchy  التسلسل الهرمى, and often make of women of the people the equals of the very greatest ladies.
Mathilde suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born to enjoy all delicacies اشهى الاطعمة  and all luxuries. She was distressed at the poverty of her dwelling مسكن, at the bareness of the walls, at the shabby متهالك chairs,the ugliness of the curtains. All those things, of which another woman of her rank would never even have been conscious, tortured her and made her angry. The sight of the little Breton peasant who did her humble housework aroused in her despairing regrets and bewildering dreams. She thought of silent ante-chambers hung with Oriental tapestry فرش , illumined by tall bronze candelabra شمعدان, and of two great footmen in knee breeches who sleep in the big armchairs, made drowsy by the oppressive heat of the stove. She thought of long reception halls hung with ancient silk, of the dainty cabinets containing priceless curiosities  العجيبةand of the little coquettish perfumed reception rooms made for chatting at five o’clock with intimate friends, with men famous and sought after, whom all women envy and whose attention they all desire.
    When she sat down to dinner, before the round table covered with a tablecloth in use three days, opposite her husband, who uncovered the soup tureen سلطانية and declared with a delighted air ,“Ah, the good soup! I don’t know anything better than that,”
she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry that peopled the walls with ancient personages and with strange birds flying in the midst of a fairy forest; and she thought of delicious dishes served on marvelous plates and of the whispered gallantries to which you listen with a sphinxlike smile while you are eating the pink meat of a trout or the wings of a quail.She had no gowns, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that. She felt made for that. She would have liked so much to please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after.
She had a friend, a former schoolmate at the convent, who was rich, and whom she did not like to go to see any more because she felt so sad when she came home.
But one evening her husband reached home with a triumphant air and holding a large envelope in his hand.
 There,” said he, “there is something for you.”She tore the paper quickly and drew out a printed card which bore these words:  The Minister of Public Instruction and Madame Georges Ramponneau request the honor of M. and Madame Loisel’s company at the palace of the Ministry on Monday evening,
                                                                         January 18th.
Instead of being delighted, as her husband had hoped, she threw the invitation on the table crossly, muttering:What do you wish me to do with that?”
“Why, my dear, I thought you would be glad. You never go out, and this is such a fine opportunity. I had great trouble to get it. Everyone wants to go; it is very select, and they are not giving many invitations to clerks. The whole official world will
be there.”
She looked at him with an irritated glance and said impatiently:
“And what do you wish me to put on my back?”
He had not thought of that. He stammered: Why, the gown you go to the theatre in. It looks very well to me.”
He stopped, distracted, seeing that his wife was weepingتنتحب . Two great tears ran slowly from the corners of her eyes toward the corners of her mouth.
“What’s the matter? What’s the matter?” he answered.
By a violent effort she conquered her grief and replied in a calm voice, while she wiped her wet cheeks: Nothing. Only I have no gown ثوب, and, therefore, I can’t go to this ball. Give your card to some colleague whose wife is better equipped than I am.”
He was in despair. He resumed: Come, let us see, Mathilde. How much would it cost, a suitable gown, which you could use on other occasions something very simple?”
She reflected several seconds, making her calculations and wondering also what sum she could ask without drawing on herself an immediate refusal and a frightened exclamation from the economical clerk.
Finally she replied hesitating: I don’t know exactly, but I think I could manage it with four hundred francs.”
He grew a little pale, because he was laying aside just that amount to buy a gun and treat himself to a little shooting next summer on the plain of Nanterre, with several friends who went to shoot larks  there of a Sunday.
But he said:Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown.”
The day of the ball drew near and Madame Loisel seemed sad, uneasy, anxious. Her frock was ready, however. Her husband said to her one evening:
“What is the matter? Come, you have seemed very queer these last three days.”
And she answered: It annoys me not to have a single piece of jewelry, not a
single ornament, nothing to put on. I shall look poverty strickenمنكوب بالفقر. I would almost rather not go at all.”
“You might wear natural flowers,” said her husband. “They’re very stylish at this time of year. For ten francs you can get two or three magnificent roses.” She was not convinced.  No; there’s nothing more humiliating than to look poor among other women who are rich.”
“How stupid you are!” her husband cried. “Go look up your friend, Madame Forestier, and ask her to lend you some jewels. You’re intimate enough with her to do that.”
She uttered a cry of joy: True! I never thought of it.”
The next day she went to her friend and told her of her distress.
Madame Forestier went to a wardrobe with a mirror, took out a large jewel box, brought it back, opened it and said to Madame Loisel:Choose, my dear.”
She saw first some bracelets, then a pearl necklace, then aVenetian gold cross set with precious stones, of admirable workmanship. She tried on the ornaments before the mirror, hesitated and could not make up her mind to part with them, to give them back. She kept asking: Haven’t you any more?”
“Why, yes. Look further; I don’t know what you like.”
Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin box, a superb diamond necklace, and her heart throbbed with an immoderate desire. Her hands trembled as she took it. She fastened it round her throat, outside her high-necked waist, and was lost in ecstasy at her reflection in the mirror.
Then she asked, hesitating, filled with anxious doubt:
“Will you lend me this, only this?”
“Why, yes, certainly.”
She threw her arms round her friend’s neck, kissed her passionately, then fled with her treasure.
The night of the ball arrived. Madame Loisel was a great success. She was prettier than any other woman present, elegant,graceful, smiling and wild with joy. All the men looked at her,asked her name, sought to be introduced. All the attaches of
the Cabinet wished to waltz with her. She was remarked by the minister himself.
She danced with raptureنشوة , with passionعاطفة , intoxicated by pleasure ثملة بهذه المتعة , forgetting all in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in a sort of cloud of happiness comprised of all this homage, admiration, these awakened desires and of that sense of triumph which is so sweet to woman’s heart.
She left the ball about four o’clock in the morning. Her husband had been sleeping since midnight in a little deserted anteroom غرفة المدخل with three other gentlemen whose wives were enjoying the ball.He threw over her shoulders the wraps he had brought, the modest wraps of common life, the poverty of which contrasted
with the elegance of the ball dress. She felt this and wished toescape so as not to be remarked by the other women, who were enveloping themselves in costly furs.
Loisel held her back, saying: “Wait a bit. You will catch cold outside. I will call a cab.”
But she did not listen to him and rapidly descended the stairs.
When they reached the street they could not find a carriage and began to look for one, shouting after the cabmen passing at a distance.
They went toward the Seine in despair, shivering with cold.
At last they found on the quay رصيف الميناء one of those ancient night cabs which, as though they were ashamed to show their shabbiness during the day, are never seen round Paris until after dark.
It took them to their dwelling in the Rue des Martyrs, and sadly they mounted the stairs to their flat. All was ended for her. As to him, he reflected that he must be at the ministry at ten o’clock that morning.
She removed her wraps before the glass so as to see herself once more in all her glory. But suddenly she uttered a cry. She no longer had the necklace around her neck!
“What is the matter with you?” demanded her husband, already half undressed.
She turned distractedly toward him.
“I have—I have—I’ve lost Madame Forestier’s necklace,” she cried.
He stood up, bewildered.What!—how? Impossible!”
They looked among the folds of her skirt, of her cloak, in her pockets, everywhere, but did not find it.
“You’re sure you had it on when you left the ball?” he asked.
“Yes, I felt it in the vestibule of the minister’s house.”
“But if you had lost it in the street we should have heard it fall. It must be in the cab.”
“Yes, probably. Did you take his number?”
“No. And you—didn’t you notice it?”
“No.”
They looked, thunderstruck, at each other. At last Loisel put on his clothes.
“I shall go back on foot,” said he, “over the whole route, to see whether I can find it.”
He went out. She sat waiting on a chair in her ball dress,without strength to go to bed, overwhelmed, without any fire,without a thought.
Her husband returned about seven o’clock. He had found nothing. He went to police headquarters, to the newspaper offices to offer a reward; he went to the cab companies everywhere, in fact, whither he was urged by the least spark of hope.
     She waited all day, in the same condition of mad fear before this terrible calamityمصيبة.
Loisel returned at night with a hollow, pale face. He had discovered nothing.
“You must write to your friend,” said he, “that you have broken the claspقفل of her necklace and that you are having it mended.
That will give us time to turn round.”She wrote at his dictation.
     At the end of a week they had lost all hope. Loisel, who had aged five years, declared:
“We must consider how to replace that ornament.”
The next day they took the box that had contained it and went to the jeweler whose name was found within. He consulted his books.
“It was not I, madame, who sold that necklace; I must simply have furnished the case.”
Then they went from jeweler to jeweler, searching for a necklace like the other, trying to recall it, both sick with chagrin الحزن والكدرand grief.
    They found, in a shop at the Palais Royal, a string of diamonds that seemed to them exactly like the one they had lost.
    It was worth forty thousand francs. They could have it for thirty six.
So they begged the jeweler not to sell it for three days yet.
      And they made a bargain that he should buy it back for thirty four thousand francs, in case they should find the lost necklace before the end of February.
    Loisel possessed eighteen thousand francs which his father had left him. He would borrow the rest. He did borrow, asking a thousand francs of one, five hundred of another, five louis here, three louis there. He gave notes, took up ruinous obligations, dealt with usurers and all the race
of lenders. He compromised all the rest of his life, risked signing a note without even knowing whether he could meet it; and, frightened by the trouble yet to come, by the black misery that was about to fall upon him, by the prospect of all the physical privations and moral tortures that he was to suffer, he went to get the new necklace, laying upon the jeweler’s counter thirty six thousand francs.
     When Madame Loisel took back the necklace Madame Forestier said to her with a chilly بارد manner: You should have returned it sooner; I might have needed it.”
She did not open the case, as her friend had so much feared.
If she had detected the substitution استبدال, what would she have thought, what would she have said? Would she not have taken Madame Loisel for a thief ?
   Thereafter Madame Loisel knew the horrible existence of the needy. She bore her part, however, with sudden heroism. That dreadful debt must be paid. She would pay it. They dismissed their servant; they changed their lodgings; they rented a garret under the roof.
She came to know what heavy housework meant and the odious بغيض  cares of the kitchen. She washed the dishes, using her dainty fingers and rosy nails on greasy دهنى pots and pans. She washed the soiled linen الكتان المتسخ, the shirts and the dishcloths, which she dried upon a line; she carried the slops down to the street every morning and carried up the water, stopping for breath at every landing.
And dressed like a woman of the people, she went to the fruiterer, the grocer, the butcher, a basket on her arm, bargaining, meeting with impertinence, defending her miserable money, sou by sou.
     Every month they had to meet some notes, renew others, obtain more time.
Her husband worked evenings, making up a tradesman’s accounts, and late at night he often copied manuscript for five sous a page.
   This life lasted ten years.
   At the end of ten years they had paid everything, everything ,with the rates of usury and the accumulations of the compound interest.
Madame Loisel looked old now. She had become the woman of impoverished households—strong and hard and rough. With frowsy hair, skirts askew and red hands, she talked loud while washing the floor with great swishes of water. But sometimes, when her husband was at the office, she sat down near the window and she thought of that gay evening of long ago, of that ball where she had been so beautiful and so admired.
What would have happened if she had not lost that necklace? Who knows? who knows? How strange and changeful is life! How small a thing is needed to make or ruin us!
But one Sunday, having gone to take a walk in the Champs Elysees to refresh herself after the labors of the week, she suddenly perceived نظرت الى  a woman who was leading a child. It was Madame Forestier, still young, still beautiful, still charming.
Madame Loisel felt moved. Should she speak to her? Yes, certainly. And now that she had paid, she would tell her all about it. Why not?
She went up.
“Good-day, Jeanne.”
The other, astonished to be familiarly addressed by this plain good-wife, did not recognize her at all and stammered: But madam!—I do not know—You must have mistaken.”
“No. I am Mathilde Loisel.”
Her friend uttered a cry. Oh, my poor Mathilde! How you are changed!”
“Yes, I have had a pretty hard life, since I last saw you, and great poverty and that because of you!”
“Of me! How so?”
“Do you remember that diamond necklace you lent me to wear at the ministerial ball?”
“Yes. Well?”
“Well, I lost it.”
“What do you mean? You brought it back.”
“I brought you back another exactly like it. And it has taken us ten years to pay for it. You can understand that it was not easy for us, for us who had nothing. At last it is ended, and I am very glad.”
Madame Forestier had stopped.
“You say that you bought a necklace of diamonds to replace mine?”
“Yes. You never noticed it, then! They were very similar.”
And she smiled with a joy that was at once proud and ingenuous.
Madame Forestier, deeply moved, took her hands.
“Oh, my poor Mathilde! Why, my necklace was paste نسخة مقلدة! It was worth at most only five hundred francs!”